The most reliable mobility data available anywhere
Power your analytics, models, and products with unparalleled movement data.

Trusted by Leaders in Adtech,
Enterprise, GIS, and Research
Move from Raw Data to Actionable Intelligence
We deliver device-level, privacy-safe location data at scale, empowering teams to move faster, go deeper, and build smarter.

Receive billions of high-quality, first-party location observations daily

Seamlessly ingest into your analytics stack, data warehouse, or API workflows.

Industry-leading compliance norms, fully GDPR- and CCPA-adherent.
Location Data That Works Where You Do
Whatever your vertical, Veraset delivers the location data you need to win.

Location Data Products
Choose the dataset that best fits your use case — or combine for maximum insight. Available via API or flat file.
Understand Mobility At Scale
Our foundational global dataset—pseudonymized GPS pings that capture real-world movement at scale.
Billions of granular daily location observations across the globe
Device-level and aggregated available
Seamlessly ingest into your S3 or GCP data warehouse or via API

Understand Who Visits, Where, and When
GPS signal and precise polygons merged to reveal visitation patterns at key points of interest (POI).
Accurate visit attribution and dwell time measurement for millions of points of interest
Measure foot traffic trends with normalized and extrapolated counts
Seamlessly ingest into your S3 or GCP data warehouse or via API

Understand Where Audiences Live
and Work
Home and Work locations inferred via machine learning from six weeks of daytime and nighttime location data.
Devices linked to Movement dataset
Low confidence devices eliminated and work-from-home devices identified
Precise down to H3

Connect Devices Across
Datasets with Confidence.
A linking product that resolves device identity for unified analysis.
Consistent cross-dataset identifiers for seamless joins
Build richer profiles by combining multiple datasets
Ensure accuracy without sacrificing privacy

Understand Mobility At Scale Every Step of the Customer Journey
Trip-level data that maps device movement across geographic routes.
Origin-destination insights that enhance Movement dataset
Ideal for cross-visitation trending, infrastructure optimization, and planning
Observations for 100+ million trips per month

Veraset Orchestrator
Our self-serve mobility intelligence platform gives teams direct access to global movement data for insight, analysis, and audience creation.

Unlock Mobility Intelligence
Turn real-world movement into insights, audiences and action.

Get in touch
Connect with our team to share your goals and explore how Veraset can help.

Try our data risk-free
Access a sample dataset to validate quality and fit for your use case via API or direct delivery.

Seamless Onboarding
Get set up quickly with dedicated support to maximize impact from Day 1.

Get Data That Delivers
Receive continuous, privacy-safe location data that fuels smarter decisions and a lasting competitive edge.
Why Teams Trust Veraset
We prioritize privacy and sourcing high-quality, first-party data so you can focus on implementation and impact.
Mobile devices from 200+ countries across US, LATAM, EU, APAC, EMEA, and ROW
Daily location pings worldwide—including 300M in the US
On-time delivery and uptime reputation
Learn. Explore. Innovate.
Get the latest insights, product updates, and technical documentation.

How to Choose a Mobility Data Provider: A Buyer's Guide
The 5 Biggest Mistakes Buyers Make When Evaluating Mobility Data, and How to Avoid Them
Choosing a mobility data provider isn't just about comparing datasets.
Whether you're building audiences, measuring campaign performance, selecting new retail locations, or powering research and AI models, the quality of your decisions depends on choosing the right data, and the right partner.
Yet many evaluation processes focus on the wrong criteria. Buyers compare scale, coverage, or pricing before they've clearly defined their use case or goals.
After years of working with agencies, retailers, researchers, and technology partners, we've seen the same evaluation mistakes surface time and again.
Here are five of the most common mistakes (and how to avoid them).
Mistake #1: Starting with the Data Instead of the Business Problem
One of the biggest mistakes buyers make is evaluating providers before they've clearly defined what they're trying to accomplish.
Different use cases require different strengths.
For example:
- Audience creation may prioritize scale and consistency.
- Retail site selection may depend on geographic precision and long-term visitation trends.
- Attribution requires reliable methodology and confidence in movement patterns.
- AI applications often demand flexible access to large, well-structured datasets.
Without first defining your objectives, it's easy to optimize for the wrong criteria — choosing a provider based on the largest dataset, the lowest price, or the longest feature list, rather than the one that's best suited to your specific use case.
Before evaluating vendors, ask yourself:
- What business question am I trying to answer or solve?
- Who will use this data, and how?
- What does success look like?
- Which capabilities are essential and which are nice to have?
Once that answer is clear, evaluating providers becomes much more straightforward. Instead of searching for the "best" mobility data provider, you'll be looking for the provider that's best equipped to help you achieve your goals.
Mistake #2: Assuming All Mobility Data Is Created Equal
Not all mobility data is collected, processed, or delivered in the same way, and those differences can have a meaningful impact on the insights you generate.
Providers may offer:
- Raw location observations
- Processed or modeled datasets
- Aggregated insights
- Specialized products built for specific workflows
None of these approaches is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on what you're trying to accomplish, who will be using the data, and how much flexibility or customization your team requires.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- How is the data collected and sourced?
- What processing or modeling has been applied?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- What quality assurance and validation processes are in place?
- Does the provider offer the data in a format that fits my workflow—whether that's raw data, APIs, or ready-to-use insights?
Understanding these differences will help ensure you're evaluating providers based on what matters most for your business, rather than assuming all mobility data delivers the same value.
Mistake #3: Confusing More Data with Better Data
Bigger is not always better. A larger dataset isn't valuable if it lacks the precision, consistency, or quality required for your application.
If you're building national audiences, training AI models, or conducting broad market analysis, having a large, representative dataset can be a significant advantage. In these scenarios, greater scale often translates into more robust insights and better statistical confidence.
But there are many cases where simply having more data won't improve your results.
For applications like visitation analysis, site selection, attribution, or localized market intelligence, factors such as precision, consistency, and data quality can be just as important — if not more so — than the total number of devices.
Instead of asking, "Who has the biggest dataset?" consider questions like:
- Is the dataset representative of the population I'm trying to understand?
- Is coverage consistent across the geographies that matter most to me?
- How is data quality monitored and maintained?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- Does the provider have the scale my specific use case requires?
The best mobility data provider for you is the one with the right combination of scale, quality, and consistency for your business objectives.
Mistake #4: Treating Privacy as a Checkbox
Privacy has become one of the most important considerations when evaluating mobility data, but it's about much more than checking a compliance box.
As regulations continue to evolve and consumer expectations around data transparency increase, organizations need confidence that the data they're using has been collected and managed responsibly. A provider's approach to privacy doesn't just impact legal compliance—it can also influence data quality, business continuity, and long-term trust.
When evaluating mobility data providers, ask questions such as:
- How is user consent obtained and respected?
- How is data collected and sourced?
- What governance and quality controls are in place?
- How does the provider adapt to changing privacy regulations?
- What processes exist to ensure responsible data stewardship over time?
The strongest providers view privacy as an ongoing commitment. They invest in transparent practices, continuously monitor the evolving regulatory landscape, and build privacy considerations into the way they collect, manage, and deliver data.
Ultimately, a thoughtful approach to privacy benefits everyone. It helps organizations reduce risk, maintain confidence in their data strategy, and build solutions that are sustainable as the industry continues to evolve.
Mistake #5: Assuming There's Only One Way to Access Mobility Data
One of the most overlooked aspects of evaluating a mobility data provider is how you'll actually access and use the data.
Organizations have different technical capabilities, workflows, and business needs. A data science team building custom models has very different requirements than a marketing team looking for audience insights or an analyst exploring visitation trends.
That's why the best providers offer multiple ways to work with their data.
For example, at Veraset, customers can choose the approach that best fits their organization:
- Flat Files for organizations that want direct access to raw data for custom analysis, modeling, and integration into their own environments.
- APIs for teams that need real-time or on-demand access to mobility data within existing applications and workflows.
- Self-Service Platform for business users who want to explore mobility insights, visualize trends, and answer questions without relying on engineering resources.
No single delivery method is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on your team's technical expertise, your existing technology stack, and the business problems you're trying to solve.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- Does this provider support the way my team prefers to work?
- Can different teams access the data in the ways they need?
- Will this delivery model scale as our use cases evolve?
- If our needs change, will we have to switch providers or simply use a different product?
The best mobility data partner isn't just one that delivers high-quality data. It's one that can deliver that data in the format that creates the most value for your organization today and as your business grows.
What Great Evaluations Have in Common
Successful buyers don't begin by comparing vendors; they begin by defining success. They ask thoughtful questions about their business objectives, data quality requirements, privacy expectations, and operational workflows before narrowing their list of providers.
That approach consistently leads to stronger partnerships and better business outcomes.
If you're evaluating mobility data providers, we'd be happy to help you think through the process. Whether you're comparing vendors, validating an existing solution, or exploring a new use case, our team can help you ask the right questions before making a decision.
Get in touch to discuss your use case.

Ensuring Data Security and Privacy: Our Commitment to Protecting Data
See how Veraset ensures top-tier data security and privacy through encryption and partner protection.
In an era where data breaches and privacy concerns dominate headlines, safeguarding sensitive information has never been more critical.
At Veraset, we take data security, privacy, and partner protection seriously. Recent high-profile breaches in the industry have underscored the importance of robust security measures.
In the article below, we outline the key protocols we’ve implemented to ensure the highest standards of data protection and maintain the trust of our clients and partners.
Minimizing Risk
At Veraset, we’ve built our systems with security as a top priority. Here’s how we protect our infrastructure and operations:
- No Marketplaces: Unlike some data providers, Veraset does not distribute data through third-party marketplaces. This ensures that data is only accessible directly through our secure systems, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access or exposure.
- Server-to-Server Connections: All data delivery is conducted exclusively through server-to-server connections. This means data is pushed directly from our environment to our clients’ environments, eliminating any public exposure or intermediaries in the exchange. All data transfers utilize up-to-date, secure protocols and that systems are regularly audited for potential vulnerabilities.
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Access to sensitive systems, such as AWS, is provisioned through Okta. This allows us to grant specific roles to users, ensuring that only authorized personnel can access the resources they need. With fine-grained control over permissions, we maintain a secure and efficient workflow.
Protecting Our Data
We go above and beyond to ensure that the data we handle is protected at every stage of its lifecycle. Here’s how we do it:
- Veraset Anonymous Identifiers (VAIDR): Our pipeline uses pseudonymized identifiers that cannot be reverse-engineered. This means that even if someone were to access a VAIDIR, they wouldn’t be able to trace it back to an individual.
- Data Segregation: Personally identifiable information (PII) is stored separately from other data types, such as location, demographic, and device data. These datasets are only brought together at the point of delivery, reducing the risk of exposure.
- Encryption and Regular Testing: All data is encrypted during transit, and we conduct penetration testing every six to twelve months to identify and address potential vulnerabilities. These proactive measures ensure that our systems remain secure against evolving threats.
- Code Reviews: Any data provisioning requires a code review and approval by a second developer. This two-step process prevents unauthorized access and ensures accountability.
Protecting Our Partners: Safeguarding Identities and Access
We understand that our partners rely on us to protect their interests as well. Here’s how we ensure their security:
- Supplier Anonymization: Suppliers are identified by unique codes rather than names, protecting their identities from exposure and maintaining their anonymity.
- Controlled Access: When we expose a data bucket to a partner, access is provisioned to a specific user within their organization. This minimizes the risk of exposure, as a breach would require compromising that user’s credentials.
- Use Case Vetting: Before proceeding with data evaluation, all prospects must state their intended use case, which is reviewed and approved by our team. This ensures that data is only used for legitimate and authorized purposes.
Key Takeaways for Clients
When you partner with Veraset, you can trust that your data is in safe hands. In sum, what sets us apart is:
- Direct and Secure Data Delivery: Our server-to-server connections ensure minimal exposure risk.
- Advanced Data Protection: Sensitive data is pseudonymized, segregated, and encrypted for maximum security.
- Partner Safeguards: We protect the identities of our partners and suppliers through anonymization and controlled access.
- Proactive Security Measures: Regular testing and robust access controls prevent unauthorized data access.
We’re committed to maintaining the highest standards of data security and privacy. By implementing these measures, we not only protect our data but also uphold the trust and confidence of our clients and partners.
---
Stay secure. Stay confident. Partner with Veraset.
For more information about our data security practices, contact us today.

FTC Enforcements Against Location Data in 2024
The FTC is intensifying its oversight of sensitive location data, enforcing stricter transparency, consent, and privacy standards across the data ecosystem.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently intensified its focus on the protection of sensitive location data, marking a significant shift in its regulatory approach. This heightened scrutiny is evident through a series of enforcement actions against data brokers and companies involved in the collection, processing, and sale of location data. These actions underscore the FTC's commitment to safeguarding consumer privacy and ensuring that companies adhere to transparent and ethical data practices.
X-Mode Social and Outlogic
On January 9, 2024, the FTC issued its first-ever prohibition on the use, sale, and disclosure of sensitive location data against X-Mode Social and Outlogic (collectively referred to as "X-Mode"). This landmark action was driven by allegations that X-Mode engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by misrepresenting the use of location data and failing to obtain proper consumer consent. The FTC's complaint highlighted several critical issues:
- Inadequate Disclosure of Use and Purpose: X-Mode's privacy disclosures were found to be insufficient, failing to inform consumers about the full extent of data usage, including the sale of location data to government entities. This lack of transparency prevented consumers from making informed decisions about their data.
- Inadequate Protections for Sensitive Data: Until May 2023, X-Mode did not restrict the collection of location data from sensitive locations such as healthcare facilities, churches, and schools. The company lacked policies to remove sensitive locations from raw data before selling it, raising significant privacy concerns.
- Failure to Honor Consumer Privacy Choices: X-Mode was criticized for not respecting consumer privacy preferences, particularly in cases where users had opted out of data collection.
The FTC's order against X-Mode mandated the implementation of an SDK Supplier Assessment Program to ensure that third-party apps using X-Mode's software development kits (SDKs) obtained proper consumer consent and adhered to privacy standards.
InMarket Media
Shortly after the action against X-Mode, the FTC announced a similar enforcement action against InMarket Media on January 18, 2024. The case against InMarket emphasized the need for transparency, proper notice, and consumer consent regarding the processing of sensitive location data. Key issues identified in the complaint included:
- Lack of Consumer Notification: InMarket failed to notify consumers that their location data was being used for targeted advertising. The consent screens within apps only mentioned that location data would be used for app functionality, omitting details about precise location tracking and its commercial use.
- Excessive Data Retention: InMarket's five-year retention period for location data was deemed excessively long, increasing the risk of data misuse or re-identification.
The FTC's order against InMarket prohibited the company from sharing, selling, or transferring sensitive location data without explicit consumer consent.
Broader Implications and Industry Impact
The FTC's recent actions against X-Mode and InMarket are part of a broader effort to address the growing concerns over the use of personal data in advertising and other commercial activities. These cases highlight several critical themes that are likely to shape future regulatory actions:
- Transparency and Consumer Consent. One of the central issues in both the X-Mode and InMarket cases was the lack of transparency and inadequate consumer consent. The FTC has made it clear that companies must provide clear and conspicuous privacy disclosures that accurately describe how consumer data will be used. Vaguely worded consent forms or disclosures that omit critical information are insufficient and can lead to enforcement actions.
- Protection of Sensitive Data. The FTC has emphasized that certain types of data, such as location data, are inherently sensitive and require robust protections. This sensitivity is due to the potential for such data to reveal intimate details about a person's life, such as visits to medical facilities, places of worship, or other sensitive locations. The FTC's actions signal that the sale or misuse of such data without proper safeguards is unacceptable.
- Data Minimization and Retention Policies. The FTC has also focused on the principles of data minimization and appropriate data retention periods. Companies are encouraged to collect only the data necessary for their operations and to retain it for the shortest time possible. Long retention periods increase the risk of data breaches and misuse, and the FTC is likely to scrutinize such practices closely.
- Future Directions and Regulatory Trends. The FTC's recent enforcement actions are indicative of a broader regulatory trend towards stricter oversight of data practices. Several key themes and potential future directions can be identified:
- Increased Enforcement and Penalties. The FTC has signaled its intention to continue aggressive enforcement actions against companies that violate consumer privacy. This includes not only fines and penalties but also more stringent measures such as outright bans on certain data practices, as seen in the cases against X-Mode and InMarket.
- Focus on Upstream Liability. FTC Chair Lina Khan has emphasized the importance of addressing upstream liability, targeting not just the consumer-facing applications but also the backend infrastructure that facilitates data collection and processing. This approach aims to hold all actors in the data ecosystem accountable for their roles in enabling unlawful conduct.
- Algorithmic Disgorgement. The FTC has increasingly used the tool of algorithmic disgorgement, requiring companies to delete not only unlawfully obtained data but also the data products created from such data. This measure aims to address the incentives that drive harmful data practices and ensure that companies do not benefit from their unlawful actions.
- Comprehensive Privacy Legislation. There is growing support within the FTC for comprehensive privacy legislation that would provide baseline protections for all consumers. Such legislation could help address the challenges posed by new technologies and business models that rely on extensive data collection.
Summing up
The FTC's recent enforcement actions against X-Mode Social, Outlogic, and InMarket Media represent a significant step towards stronger protection of sensitive location data. These actions highlight the importance of transparency, consumer consent, and robust data protection measures.
As the data economy continues to evolve, the FTC's regulatory approach is likely to become increasingly critical in ensuring that consumer privacy is respected and protected. Companies operating in this space must heed the lessons from these enforcement actions and adopt best practices to avoid similar scrutiny in the future.
New platform enables teams to turn large-scale mobility datasets into insights, audiences and action.
Veraset Launches Orchestrator, a Self-Serve Platform for Scalable Mobility Intelligence
ALEXANDRIA, VA — March 24, 2026 — Veraset, a global provider of privacy-safe mobility data, today announced the launch of Orchestrator, a self-serve platform that enables organizations to transform mobility data into repeatable workflows, insights, and audiences without complex engineering or manual data pulls.
As demand for real-world behavioral insights grows across industries — from advertising and retail to real estate and urban planning — organizations increasingly rely on mobility data to understand how people move, visit locations, and interact with physical environments. Yet working with mobility data often requires engineering resources, manual scripts, and custom data extracts that limit accessibility for many organizations.
Orchestrator simplifies that process by giving analysts, marketing and data teams direct, self-serve access to mobility intelligence.
“With Orchestrator, we’re putting the power of mobility data directly in the hands of the people who need it,” said Geoffrey Prince, CEO of Veraset. “Teams can explore location intelligence, analyze behavior, and move from insight to activation far faster than traditional data workflows allow.”
Using Orchestrator, organizations can define locations and points of interest, extract mobility data across flexible geographies and timeframes, analyze visitation and movement patterns, and transform those insights into datasets or audience cohorts for research, measurement, or activation.
The platform enables teams to build automated workflows that replace one-off data pulls with repeatable processes. Users can schedule recurring queries and reports, analyze results through maps and dashboards, and export compliant datasets or audiences for downstream analytics and advertising platforms.
Orchestrator is designed to support a wide range of use cases, including foot traffic analysis, market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
The launch of Orchestrator expands how organizations can access Veraset’s mobility data. In addition to the self-serve platform, Veraset continues to provide mobility datasets via flat file delivery for large-scale data processing and API access for automated querying and integration into existing products or workflows.
Veraset’s mobility intelligence is built on more than 10 billion daily location observations across over 200 countries, providing global coverage and device-level precision. The company’s datasets, including movement, visits, home and work insights, and trips, are trusted by organizations across advertising, technology, consulting, real estate, retail, education, and municipalities to understand real-world behavior at scale.
Orchestrator is available today to Veraset customers. Click here to learn more.
About Veraset
Veraset transforms real-world movement into trusted mobility intelligence. Its privacy-first, responsibly sourced data spans 200+ countries and powers critical use cases including market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience and visitation insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
From raw location signals to structured journey insights, delivered via direct data access, API, or self-serve tools, Veraset provides the reliable foundation teams need to move faster, go deeper, and build smarter solutions. Learn more at www.veraset.com

The surprising foot-traffic champion of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
What movement data revealed about visitor behavior during the 2026 FIFA World Cup
The 2026 FIFA World Cup spent its opening weeks on US soil: eleven host cities; billions of eyes; sold-out stadiums from Seattle to Miami.
And by the numbers, the world really did show up: more than a million international visitors from 194 countries were in the US in the first three weeks alone, led by Mexico, Canada, and Brazil.

So when we went looking for the tournament's clearest fingerprint in America's foot-traffic data, we assumed the single spot (outside of a stadium) where we could see the on-the-ground impact of the World Cup would be a downtown fan zone or a stadium-adjacent street packed with bars.
But, no. It was a Waffle House, in Atlanta, a few miles away from the Mercedes-Benz stadium.
The internet saw it too
The data isn't the only place this showed up. Waffle House had a genuine viral moment during the tournament. A German fan posting as @FreddyLA7 documented his 1am first-ever Waffle House run ("great food, great prices, friendly staff, 10/10") and the post racked up millions of views, with Waffle House's own account chiming in to thank him. He wasn't alone: international fans across social media went wide-eyed over American institutions like Buc-ee's, Walmart, and, again and again, Waffle House.
Waffle House leaned all the way in. The downtown Atlanta location, a short walk from the FIFA Fan Festival, opened a pop-up shop selling Waffle House soccer jerseys and branded soccer balls, and fans from around the world lined up for a piece of it.
So when our data shows Waffle House traffic concentrating near the Atlanta stadium once matches began, it isn't measuring something invisible. It's the quantified version of a thing the internet was already buzzing about. The memes said "the fans found the Waffle House." The foot-traffic data says: yes, they did, here's exactly how much.
The one signal that popped
We pulled the foot-traffic data for all eleven host cities to find out.
In Atlanta, around Mercedes-Benz Stadium, here's what surfaced. In the weeks before the tournament, about 8.5% of metro Atlanta's Waffle House visits happened within three miles of the stadium. Once the World Cup started, that jumped to 16.6%. The share of the city's Waffle House traffic clustering around the venue roughly doubled.

Now the part that makes it interesting
This wasn't just a correlation to a surge in visitors to Atlanta. We checked. Overall foot traffic near the stadium barely budged, the metro didn't surge, and the area around the venue didn't broadly fill up. And it wasn't chain restaurants in general: Chili's, three miles from the same stadium, showed no change.
It was Waffle House, specifically. And, once the matches started, specifically.
Which, if you think about it, tracks perfectly. A 24-hour, cash-friendly, no-pretense diner steps from a World Cup stadium is exactly where you end up after a match, whether you're a Buckhead local or you drove three hours for the game. The World Cup didn't flood Atlanta; it funneled a very particular crowd into a very particular institution.
Why a city-level headline would have missed this entirely
Ask "did the World Cup boost Atlanta?" and the honest answer is a shrug. City-wide, not measurably.
Ask "what happened inside a three-mile ring around the stadium, at one specific kind of place, once the whistle blew?" And there's your story.
Mega-events don't necessarily move cities in one big uniform wave. They move specific people to specific places at specific times, and most of that is invisible unless you can zoom all the way in. Foot-traffic data allows us to zoom in and understand movement patterns before, during, and after an event. In this case, it was Waffle House.
Methodology
We looked at foot traffic during the 2026 FIFA World Cup tournament's opening weeks (June 11–30) versus the weeks right before it, measuring visits within three miles of each host stadium as a share of total metro visits to the same chains (Chili's and Waffle House). Using each city as its own before-and-after control keeps the comparison honest and unaffected by shifts in data coverage over time. We ran it across all eleven US host cities and both chains. Atlanta Waffle House was the signal that stood up.
The rest of the host cities? Quiet. Which, honestly, is its own finding: the World Cup's footprint on American foot traffic was less a wave and more a very precise splash.
A note on the numbers: the international-visitor figure and the Waffle House figure come from two different datasets and describe two separate facts. Our data shows the world was here, and separately shows where Atlanta's Waffle House traffic went, it doesn't claim the visitors themselves were the ones ordering hash browns.
This is the kind of question movement data is built to answer: not "did something happen," but exactly where, exactly when, and exactly who showed up. Get in touch to explore what mobility data can reveal for you.

The 5 Biggest Mistakes Buyers Make When Evaluating Mobility Data, and How to Avoid Them
Choosing a mobility data provider isn't just about comparing datasets.
Whether you're building audiences, measuring campaign performance, selecting new retail locations, or powering research and AI models, the quality of your decisions depends on choosing the right data, and the right partner.
Yet many evaluation processes focus on the wrong criteria. Buyers compare scale, coverage, or pricing before they've clearly defined their use case or goals.
After years of working with agencies, retailers, researchers, and technology partners, we've seen the same evaluation mistakes surface time and again.
Here are five of the most common mistakes (and how to avoid them).
Mistake #1: Starting with the Data Instead of the Business Problem
One of the biggest mistakes buyers make is evaluating providers before they've clearly defined what they're trying to accomplish.
Different use cases require different strengths.
For example:
- Audience creation may prioritize scale and consistency.
- Retail site selection may depend on geographic precision and long-term visitation trends.
- Attribution requires reliable methodology and confidence in movement patterns.
- AI applications often demand flexible access to large, well-structured datasets.
Without first defining your objectives, it's easy to optimize for the wrong criteria — choosing a provider based on the largest dataset, the lowest price, or the longest feature list, rather than the one that's best suited to your specific use case.
Before evaluating vendors, ask yourself:
- What business question am I trying to answer or solve?
- Who will use this data, and how?
- What does success look like?
- Which capabilities are essential and which are nice to have?
Once that answer is clear, evaluating providers becomes much more straightforward. Instead of searching for the "best" mobility data provider, you'll be looking for the provider that's best equipped to help you achieve your goals.
Mistake #2: Assuming All Mobility Data Is Created Equal
Not all mobility data is collected, processed, or delivered in the same way, and those differences can have a meaningful impact on the insights you generate.
Providers may offer:
- Raw location observations
- Processed or modeled datasets
- Aggregated insights
- Specialized products built for specific workflows
None of these approaches is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on what you're trying to accomplish, who will be using the data, and how much flexibility or customization your team requires.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- How is the data collected and sourced?
- What processing or modeling has been applied?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- What quality assurance and validation processes are in place?
- Does the provider offer the data in a format that fits my workflow—whether that's raw data, APIs, or ready-to-use insights?
Understanding these differences will help ensure you're evaluating providers based on what matters most for your business, rather than assuming all mobility data delivers the same value.
Mistake #3: Confusing More Data with Better Data
Bigger is not always better. A larger dataset isn't valuable if it lacks the precision, consistency, or quality required for your application.
If you're building national audiences, training AI models, or conducting broad market analysis, having a large, representative dataset can be a significant advantage. In these scenarios, greater scale often translates into more robust insights and better statistical confidence.
But there are many cases where simply having more data won't improve your results.
For applications like visitation analysis, site selection, attribution, or localized market intelligence, factors such as precision, consistency, and data quality can be just as important — if not more so — than the total number of devices.
Instead of asking, "Who has the biggest dataset?" consider questions like:
- Is the dataset representative of the population I'm trying to understand?
- Is coverage consistent across the geographies that matter most to me?
- How is data quality monitored and maintained?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- Does the provider have the scale my specific use case requires?
The best mobility data provider for you is the one with the right combination of scale, quality, and consistency for your business objectives.
Mistake #4: Treating Privacy as a Checkbox
Privacy has become one of the most important considerations when evaluating mobility data, but it's about much more than checking a compliance box.
As regulations continue to evolve and consumer expectations around data transparency increase, organizations need confidence that the data they're using has been collected and managed responsibly. A provider's approach to privacy doesn't just impact legal compliance—it can also influence data quality, business continuity, and long-term trust.
When evaluating mobility data providers, ask questions such as:
- How is user consent obtained and respected?
- How is data collected and sourced?
- What governance and quality controls are in place?
- How does the provider adapt to changing privacy regulations?
- What processes exist to ensure responsible data stewardship over time?
The strongest providers view privacy as an ongoing commitment. They invest in transparent practices, continuously monitor the evolving regulatory landscape, and build privacy considerations into the way they collect, manage, and deliver data.
Ultimately, a thoughtful approach to privacy benefits everyone. It helps organizations reduce risk, maintain confidence in their data strategy, and build solutions that are sustainable as the industry continues to evolve.
Mistake #5: Assuming There's Only One Way to Access Mobility Data
One of the most overlooked aspects of evaluating a mobility data provider is how you'll actually access and use the data.
Organizations have different technical capabilities, workflows, and business needs. A data science team building custom models has very different requirements than a marketing team looking for audience insights or an analyst exploring visitation trends.
That's why the best providers offer multiple ways to work with their data.
For example, at Veraset, customers can choose the approach that best fits their organization:
- Flat Files for organizations that want direct access to raw data for custom analysis, modeling, and integration into their own environments.
- APIs for teams that need real-time or on-demand access to mobility data within existing applications and workflows.
- Self-Service Platform for business users who want to explore mobility insights, visualize trends, and answer questions without relying on engineering resources.
No single delivery method is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on your team's technical expertise, your existing technology stack, and the business problems you're trying to solve.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- Does this provider support the way my team prefers to work?
- Can different teams access the data in the ways they need?
- Will this delivery model scale as our use cases evolve?
- If our needs change, will we have to switch providers or simply use a different product?
The best mobility data partner isn't just one that delivers high-quality data. It's one that can deliver that data in the format that creates the most value for your organization today and as your business grows.
What Great Evaluations Have in Common
Successful buyers don't begin by comparing vendors; they begin by defining success. They ask thoughtful questions about their business objectives, data quality requirements, privacy expectations, and operational workflows before narrowing their list of providers.
That approach consistently leads to stronger partnerships and better business outcomes.
If you're evaluating mobility data providers, we'd be happy to help you think through the process. Whether you're comparing vendors, validating an existing solution, or exploring a new use case, our team can help you ask the right questions before making a decision.
Get in touch to discuss your use case.
Interested in supplying data or partnering?


What Our Partners Say
Hear from organizations building with Veraset data.
“Partnering with Veraset has elevated our ability to deliver highly effective, data-driven campaigns. They’re not just a data provider, they’re a strategic partner that has helped us deliver better outcomes for our clients.”
Put Our Data to the Test
Request a demo or start an evaluation today.

.jpg)
.jpg)


